ProfileEarly accessCO2 geological storage
Terra couples a 1-D injector directly to the 3-D formation, then solves two-phase CO2 and brine flow through injection, migration and stabilisation.
Recorded CO2 storage case showing the faulted formation mesh in 3-D, the injector column and the saturation plume growing and migrating up-dip through 25 years of injection, then stabilising over the following 25 years. The film is built from 21 recorded solver states.
Case record
Recorded formation evidence
Every replay begins on its year-50 poster. Animation loads only when requested, with one frame per stored state, fixed views and fixed colour scales.
Injector section
The plume rises to the formation roof, migrates up-dip during injection and holds its position after injection stops at year 25.
The section is cut through the native tetrahedra at y = 3300 m. One frame is shown for each recorded solver state, with no temporal interpolation.
Formation detail
C-01
The plume rises to the formation roof and stays held beneath it in both the formation-scale and near-injector views.
Two vertical cuts through the injector use the same fixed saturation scale: a formation-scale view and near-injector detail on the native mesh. One frame is shown for each recorded solver state, with no temporal interpolation.
C-02
Gas collects beneath the formation roof across the four exact plan cuts, leaving the deepest level nearly empty.
The cuts are at z = −2915, −2940, −2965 and −2990 m on the same fixed saturation scale. One frame is shown for each recorded solver state, with no temporal interpolation.
C-03
Injection reaches 11.8 Mt at year 25; after shut-in, the computed plume edge stabilises at 5.3 km.
Overpressure is Δp = p − p₀ on a fixed ±0.15 MPa scale. The adjacent plots report injected mass and plume reach against time across the 21 recorded solver states, with no temporal interpolation.
This page presents a recorded two-phase CO2-brine case in a Johansen-type formation: a 1-D injector coupled directly to the 3-D formation. It is not field validation, and it does not demonstrate production-well modelling or a separate meshing claim.
Bring a case
Tell us which injector, formation response or containment evidence your current assessment needs to resolve.